Jurors 3, 4 and He is the second to vote "not guilty". Juror 9, seeing Juror 4 rub his nose which is being irritated by his glassesrealizes that the woman who allegedly saw the murder had impressions in the sides of her nose, indicating that she wore glasses, but did not wear them in court out of vanity.
He is polite and makes a point of speaking with proper English grammar. Juror 3 gives a long and increasingly tortured string of arguments, building on earlier remarks that his relationship with his own son is deeply strained, which is ultimately why he wants the boy to be guilty.
Jurors 12, 10 and 4 then change their vote to "not guilty", leaving only Juror 3. An angry Juror 3 accuses Juror 5, who grew up in a slum, of changing his vote out of sympathy towards slum children.
A rational, unflappable, self-assured and analytical stock broker who is concerned only with the facts, and is appalled by the bigotry of Juror Juror 8 accuses him of being a sadist. Other jurors, most notable Juror 1, confirm that they saw the same thing. At the end of the film, he reveals to Juror 9 that his name is Davis, one of only two jurors to reveal his name; played by Henry Fonda.
He is the last to vote "not guilty"; played by Lee J. A complete kinescope of that performance, which had been missing for years and was feared lost, was discovered in A businessman and distraught father, opinionated, disrespectful and stubborn with a temper. An angry Juror 3 shouts that they are losing their chance to "burn" the boy.
He is the ninth to vote "not guilty", never giving the reason for changing his vote; played by Martin Balsam. He is the sixth to vote "not guilty"; played by Edward Binns. Juror 5 then changes his vote.
Most of the others turn their backs to him. The main antagonist and most passionate advocate of a guilty verdict throughout the film, due to having a poor relationship with his own son. Juror 8 argues that reasonable doubt exists, and that he therefore cannot vote "guilty", but concedes that he has merely hung the jury.
He is the seventh to vote "not guilty". An architect and the first to vote "not guilty". He finally loses his temper and tears up a photo of him and his son, but suddenly breaks down crying and changes his vote to "not guilty", making the vote unanimous.
Juror 12 then reverts his vote, making the vote 8—4. The ballot is held and a new "not guilty" vote appears. Jurors 12 and 1 then change their votes, leaving only three dissenters: Outside, Jurors 8 Davis and 9 McCardle exchange names, and all of the jurors descend the courthouse steps to return to their individual lives.
He mentions that he has three children. As the jury foreman, he is somewhat preoccupied with his duties, although helpful to accommodate others. A house painter, tough, but principled and respectful. The experiment proves the possibility but Juror 5 then steps up and demonstrates the correct way to hold and use a switchblade; revealing that anyone skilled with a switchblade, as the boy would be, would always stab underhanded at an upwards angle against an opponent who was taller than them, as the grip of stabbing downwards would be too awkward and the act of changing hands too time consuming.
A European watchmaker and naturalized American citizen who demonstrates strong patriotism. Sidney Lumetwhose prior directorial credits included dramas for television productions such as The Alcoa Hour and Studio Onewas recruited by Henry Fonda and Rose to direct.
An assistant high school American football coach. Fonda later stated that he would never again produce a film. Weiler of The New York Times wrote, "It makes for taut, absorbing, and compelling drama that reaches far beyond the close confines of its jury room setting.As Juror 8 always stay calm, polite and respectful, many of the other jurors are persuaded easier and prefer to side with him rather than juror 3 and He persuaded almost half of the jurors to vote not guilty towards the middle of the movie.
12 Angry Men is a American courtroom drama film adapted from a teleplay of the same name by Reginald Rose.
Jurors 12, 10 and 4 then change their vote to "not guilty", leaving only Juror 3. Criterion Collection Essay by Thane Rosenbaum. Act II is also marked by a different tone, outwardly manifested by the changing weather. How does the fact that the jurors are all male impact the play?
Weinbloom, Elizabeth ed. "12 Angry Men Essay Questions". GradeSaver, 30 April Web. Cite this page. Study Guide Navigation; About 12 Angry Men. 12 Angry Men study guide contains a biography of Reginald Rose, literature essays, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis.
12 Angry Men: Compare & Contrast Essay. any changes made to the key part of the story but yet the minor changes made in making the movie adaptation produce a different picture than what one imagines when reading the drama in the form of a play. (12 Angry Men) In the Movie, 12 Angry Men, 12 jurors were tasked with finding a.
The two men that cannot put their personal emotions aside are juror 3 and juror These men are motivated by their emotions rather than the evidence. Juror 3 is a strong, forceful man who refuses to alter his vote.Download