If there is a strong risk of causing significant physical damage from alcohol or drug use during the time that our young people should be getting their education and making plans for the future, they should know about it. From an economic perspective, we say that alcohol is a demerit good.
These two factors give a justification for government intervention to deal with some issues related to alcohol. Given the science on physical development that has been published in the last few years, perhaps there should be a more informed conversation on this subject to determine if legislation changes should follow.
Researchers also claim the number of crimes would drop by 24, a year. Raising the drinking age to 21 will reduce consumption amongst young people because it will be harder to buy alcohol. However, previous education policies have not seemed to be very effective. At the age of 18, we are considered developed enough to do this.
Arguably, there are better ways to deal with problems of alcohol.
Rather than a blanket ban, the government could focus on tackling binge drinking through making alcohol more expensive and tackling the drinking culture. In essence, you are considered mature enough to make such a drastic decision, which is far more dangerous to you than what alcohol threatens you with.
No matter what the legal drinking as is, young people should be informed what the risks are.
This theory seems to be supported by recent studies involving teens and young adults. Black market alcohol supplies, which may be harder to monitor. Therefore the social cost of alcohol is greater than the private cost.
For that education may be a better solution; education could help to explain the dangers of excess drinking and therefore encourage young people to drink moderation.
If the age is 18, it is much easier for a 16 or year-old to get away with drinking alcohol. They still have many alcohol-related problems, but, it is significantly more difficult for young people to regularly drink alcohol.
Tejvan Pettinger society Readers Question: People may underestimate the personal costs of drinking alcohol to excess especially amongst young people There are external costs to society, e. It will encourage people to find ways to circumnavigate the law.
But, on the other hand, it may increase the incentive to import low duty alcohol from abroad. So this raises the question—should the legal drinking age be raised to 25?
Numerous scientists studying the effects of alcohol or drugs on teens and young adults have made the statement that physical maturity, especially of the brain and nervous system, does not occur until a person reaches Apr 12, · Whether the drinking age should be lowered or increased is a controversial subject.
There are both pros and cons. I would recommend to check out Status: Resolved. Should The Alcohol Drinking Age Be Increased Or Decreased.
Sinceit has been argued that the legal drinking age in the United States should be lowered to 18 so that young adults are allowed to drink in certain environments. This argument has many sides which can be argued. The drinking age should be lowered to age 18 because teens are considered adults at this age, less people in jail for hosting underage drinking, and teens can be taught responsible drinking.
Although there is a negative side to lowering the drinking age because it can cause more motor-vehicle accidents, greater chance for alcohol problems, and. That young people drink so much may be related to the drinking age, but some believe that the restriction should be raised even higher, to the age of Many proponents of this idea cite the excessive drinking, not of high schoolers, but of college students.
Should the Legal Drinking Age be Raised to 25?
In the last few years, new studies have shed light on the age that young people reach physical maturity and it’s not Research should instead focus on answering the question of whether having a higher drinking age is an effective way to reduce drunken driving deaths and promote "a healthy approach to alcohol.Download