The history of the second world

The Cambridge History of the Second World War

No, not at all. Liddell Hart -- a World War I veteran and poison-gas survivor -- inked the finishing touches on this towering overview of World War II after working on it for 20 years, and thereafter, ironically, died immediately in the comfort of his own home.

KevinR Ky,with some slight updates and amendments in Hart was a great authority on warfare, new military theories and on WWII in particular, and him saying so either directly or indirectly does not detract from the fact.

The book has nothing about the breaking of the German Enigma code, which proved very valuable, or about the operation of the cipher-breakers in both Britain at Bletchley Park or the Navajo Code talkers who stumped the Japanese -- obviously because these ops were still classified as top secret when Hart wrote this book.

There are good, if often incomplete, battle maps herein. He also, to his credit, eschews hyperbole; there are no instances of "greatest this" or "grandest that" in his account.

At the same time he critiques with gusto and well-reasoned authority the mistakes made by the Axis and Allies high commands and political leaders in conducting all aspects of the war.

As a one-volume work of WWII strategy and tactical maneuvers, the book could hardly be bettered. Some of what I learned from the book: And what a great achievement it is, all three pounds of it.

The book is a grand legacy of a lifetime of brilliant and innovative military thinking, and up to its time was probably the best and most authoritative general overview of the war yet written.

If I was heretofore in doubt as to whether this would qualify as my annual big-ass summer read, that question laid it to rest. Anyone interested in the war to any degree would be doing that anyway.

By contrast, Hart attributes the greatest success to U. Liddell Hart was not a great writer, but his prose is clear and uncluttered and user friendly; appropo to his clear and cold-blooded analysis of the strategies and tactics employed.

Maybe it still is. Throughout the book, Hart sides with commanders who favored quick adaptation to changing conditions such as Patton and forward momentum rather than those who reverted to old and slow attrition tactics.

Hart devotes disappointingly little ink to the siege of Leningrad, where 1. There are a number of omissions and disputable points in the book.

Liddell Hart has been criticized as being a bit of a braggart know-it-all he cites himself and his own previous military works a lot along the waybut the fact that he can cite documents that actually prove his own "I told you so" foresight only lend greater weight and credibility to his analysis, in my view.

I learned a shitload from reading this. Also good is his sense of revulsion and elegant rejection of the strategic use of the atomic bomb on Japan, which he says did not really affect the outcome of the war and was merely a barbaric gesture.

He only mentions the concentration camps in passing, when at the very least they would fit well into his arguments about how the Axis undermined themselves in fruitless projects that wasted resources needed on the fronts.

There are omissions and certain instances of over-coverage on subjects nearest and dearest to Hart the North African tank battles, for instance. At the same time, it is hard to imagine a better job being done in only pages of text, which, to be fair, is really not a lot of pages in which to try to cover a six-year occurrence as massive as the second world war.

Some have also accused him of romanticizing German tank commander Rommel. His insistence that Britain was the birthplace of nearly all advanced modern war theory seems to take a biased nationalistic, and -- in his case -- self-serving tone.

The level of detail about some of the battles especially all the flanking moves and countermoves can get dizzying at times and test your attention span.History of the Second World War, B. H. Liddell Hart's last work as well as his magnum opus, embodies the fruits of twenty years of research and a lifetime of thinking on war/5.

History of the Second World War, Part 88 [Basil Liddell Hart] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Fire Raids on Japan Contents: Tito's Triumph, Return to Mandalay, Fire Raids on Japan, Tokyo Fire Raids5/5(1).

Sep 28,  · Rest in peace all those who lost their lives fighting in the second world war. They gave up their lives for what we today take for granted.

Remember them, respect them, your life wouldn't be the same without them. A tremendous thank you to. History of the Second World War [B.H.

History of the Second World War

Liddell Hart] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. The best-selling account of World War II in every theater of operations by the foremost military analyst of our time.

The late Captain Basil Liddell Hart's private library and famous and voluminous archives of personal correspondence /5(). The military events of the Second World War have been the subject of historical debate from to the present.

It mattered greatly who won, and fighting was the essential determinant of victory or defeat. The History of the Second World War is the official history of the British contribution to the Second World War and was published by Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HMSO).

The history of the second world
Rated 3/5 based on 98 review